Instructions
How the file works, what the colours mean, and the four things to settle before you print anything with a name field on it.
Asking is the easy half. A form that gets collected in a box and never tallied is worse than no form at all, because it tells a guest you asked and did not listen. This one is print-ready, it has somewhere to put the answers, and it works out your NPS and the average for each of the eight ratings on its own. Updated September 2026.
How the file works, what the colours mean, and the four things to settle before you print anything with a name field on it.
The form itself, print-ready. Eight ratings, the recommend score, two open questions, and the contact fields kept optional and last, with the notice already written into them.
Two hundred rows, one guest each. Ratings validated to 1 to 5 and the recommend score to 0 to 10, so a stray 7 in a rating column cannot quietly skew a month.
Reads the log by itself: your NPS, promoters, passives and detractors, the average and the lowest score for each of the eight ratings, the same score split by dine-in, takeaway and delivery, this month set against last month, and how many people actually opted in to hear from you.
Why a guest is not an employee under the DPDP Act, the date the notice duty starts, why a child’s birthday is not a mailing list, and why the number someone gave you to fix a complaint is not a marketing list either.
Not a sixth sheet: print The Form and it is a table card. Print the Response Log and it is a clipboard sheet for a busy service, when nobody is going anywhere near a laptop.
Petpooja POS turns this into a feedback link you send by SMS, or a system-generated QR code on the table and printed on the bill, and notifies the biller every time someone leaves negative feedback.
Explore Petpooja POSOur own guide to what to include in a restaurant feedback form sets the whole thing out: the visit details, the eight ratings, the recommend question, the two open ones. It then tells you to copy it onto a card or into a Google Form, and hands you nothing to copy from. This is that file.
But the harder half is what happens next. A stack of cards in a box by the till is not feedback, it is paper. The form only starts paying when somebody adds it up, and adding it up by hand on a Sunday is exactly the job that stops happening in week three.
So the log does it. Type the ratings in as they come, and the NPS, the eight averages and the lowest score anyone gave you appear on their own. Fix the weakest of the eight before you touch any of the others — whichever one it turns out to be, not the one you assumed it would be.
One thing about the recommend score, because it gets misread everywhere: it is promoters minus detractors over everyone who answered. The 7s and 8s count in the bottom of that fraction and nowhere else, which is the whole point of it, and a blank is skipped rather than counted as a zero. The file is built that way and says so.
We publish no benchmark to compare it against. No reliable Indian restaurant figure exists that we could stand behind, and a number off a website is worse than none because you will manage towards it. Compare this month with your own last month.
And there is a legal half nobody puts in a feedback template. The ratings are nobody's business but yours. The moment the form asks for a name, a mobile number or a birthday, you are holding personal data about a guest, and the limb of the DPDP Act that covers watching your own staff will not reach a customer. Almost none of that Act is in force yet — it arrives on 13 May 2027 — which is the argument for getting the wording right now, while it costs nothing. The file carries it, and the date.
Once the answers are in, the dine-in revenue leak audit is the natural next step for the operational side, and the opening and closing checklist is where a weak cleanliness or speed score gets fixed on the floor.
Here's a preview of what you'll get inside:
The date almost all of this starts. The DPDP Act was passed in 2023 and switched on in stages: only its machinery sections are live now, and sections 3 to 17 — consent, notice, the legitimate uses — land eighteen months after 13 November 2025, along with Rule 3. You are not caught by any of it today, which is exactly why to write the notice onto the card now rather than reprint a thousand of them later.
Source: G.S.R. 843(E) dated 13-Nov-2025, clause (c); DPDP Rules 2025, G.S.R. 846(E), Rule 1(4)Section 7(i) will make processing for employment purposes, or to safeguard the employer from loss or liability, a legitimate use. That limb is about your own people. There is no equivalent for a guest, so a guest's name and number will rest on their consent — which is why every contact field here is optional.
Source: DPDP Act 2023 (No. 22 of 2023), section 7(i), in force 13-May-2027 per G.S.R. 843(E)This file publishes no "good" NPS to aim at. No reliable Indian restaurant figure exists that we would stand behind, and a number off a website is worse than none, because you will manage towards it. Your own last month is the comparison that means something.
Source: deliberately not claimed, see Before You CollectA box of cards by the till is paper, not feedback. It is also worse than asking nothing, because the guest believes you are listening. If nobody will tally it on a Sunday, the form has to tally itself.
Someone who skipped the recommend question is not a zero out of ten. Count them and you have invented a detractor. The log leaves blanks blank and the maths skips them.
Food quality at 3.7 sounds survivable. It can hide a guest who gave you a 1 and is never coming back. The file shows the lowest score anyone gave alongside every average, because that is the row with the story in it.
Put contact details at the top and you lose the rating from anyone who would rather stay anonymous. Optional, and last, gets you more answers and fewer awkward questions about why you are holding the data.
A number left so you can call about a cold biryani was given for that. Adding it to a birthday blast is a different purpose from the one they were told. The form has a separate opt-in tick and the log counts the two apart.
Every NPS article quotes a benchmark and almost none of them are Indian restaurant data. Aim at your own last month instead, and at the weakest of your eight ratings, whichever one that turns out to be. The opening and closing checklist is where both of those actually get fixed.
| Aspect | The article on its own | With this file |
|---|---|---|
| The questions to ask | Covered well, in the article | The same questions, in a file you can print |
| Something to print | "Copy this as it stands" | A print-ready card, and a paste-ready list for a Google Form |
| Where the answers go | Not covered | A 200-row log, with the ratings validated as you type |
| Your NPS | Explained, not calculated | Worked out, with blanks skipped and passives in the denominator |
| Which rating to fix | Not answered | The weakest of the eight, and the lowest single score behind it |
| The notice you owe a guest | Not mentioned | Written onto the form, with the date the duty starts |
| Marketing consent | Mentioned as a field | Counted separately from contact details, because they are not the same thing |
Swipe the table sideways to see the full comparison.
Download the free form, print it tonight, and let the log do the arithmetic.
Petpooja is India's leading SME business software suite, trusted by 1,50,000+ businesses across restaurants, retail, healthcare, manufacturing, and more. From billing and payroll to task management and procurement, Petpooja helps Indian businesses run better, every day.
When a guest leaves negative feedback, Petpooja POS notifies the biller on the spot, so it is dealt with while they are still in the room rather than read off a spreadsheet next week.